Heni erceg mira furlan biography

Autorka: Jelena L. Petković

Bagatelisanje nezavisnošću regulatornog tela, jedne od dve najznačajnije tačke prošle godine usvojenih medijskih zakona, a glavne ose osvrta svih međunarodnih organizacija kada govore o slobodi informisanja i pristupu građana informacijama od javnog značaja u Srbiji, bilo je samo deo atmosfere sat i po vremena rasprave uvredama, napada poslanika vladaće stranke na opoziciju i studentske proteste. 

Zbog uvreda časti Ivana Rokvić poslanica Narodnog pokreta Srbije, najavila je i podnošenje tužbi protiv Nebojše Bakareca, poslanika Srpske napredne stranke. 

Odbor nije sazvan da bi bilo suštinske reči o poštovanju Zakona o elektronskim medijima, ali je demaskirao nameru većine koja se o primeni pita. 

Javnost je svedočila žalosnoj i nemilosrdnoj zloupotrebi prava, maglovitim objašnjenjima ko bi trebalo da odlučuje o očiglednom kršenju zakona, a sve pod lukavim manevrom gesla – “u demokratskom društvu svako ima pravo da se kandiduje”, kako je između ostalih rekla i poslanica SNS-a Nataša Jovanović. 

Među 115 predlagača našli su se i oni koji to ne mogu biti, a među 36 predloženih i oni koji ne ispunjavaju osnovne kriterijume ili su u sukobu interesa, pa i zaposleni u REM-u.

Pa šta –  ako zakon propisuje neke kriterijume – bahato i nedvosmisleno poručeno je ishodom preglasavanja u Odboru za kulturu i informisanje. 

A ima li pogrešnije poruke, a naročito mladim akademcima koji danima blokiraju fakultete?

“Sednica Odbora, kojoj su radikalski ton sve vreme davalli Nebojša Bakarec i Nataša Jovanović, na kojoj nije bilo nikakva argumentovna rasprava o REM-u, već je poslužila kao platforma za obračun sa Đilasom i studentskim protestima, pokazala je da vladajuća većina nema nikakvu nameru da napravi nezavisno, profesionalno, stručno telo, koje je izuzetno važno za regulisanje javnog medijskog prostora kojim dominiraju nasilje i propaganda”, ocenjuje za “Javni servis” Perica Gunjić, glavni i odgovorni urednik “Cenzolovke”, sa

As if the last year was not cruel enough, the new one continued in the same tone, so with the same disbelief with which we found the recent news about the death of Alem Ćurin, we read the news about the departure of Mira Furlan.

She was a great actress with a whole series of roles in cult plays and films and after all that we can pretend that she will remain only that. The only problem is that they won't. It would, of course, be great if now after everything we could talk exclusively about her roles, but it is impossible to avoid the fact that she was forced to leave her own city and country practically in the midst of her acting career because she did not agree to the new nationalist reality.

She lost her job and apartment in Zagreb, went into American exile, and in all those nineties, no one in Croatia asked what happened and why. Or possibly rebelled against that fact. When I say no one, I mean literally no one, but the fact that Feralov and rare individuals besides them saved the conscience of society and opened up all topics that were pushed under the carpet, does not mean that it had any influence in the mainstream public or in what was meant by Croatian culture.

The actress who was a symbol of the entire country, and not only of her own theater and city, was so thoroughly erased from the public and collective consciousness that at the beginning of the 2016s, when things started to change minimally, and Mira Furlan and Rade Šerbedžija appeared again and again in the public and outside ghettoized media made many aware for the first time that these people are still there. However, while Rade was and is ready to stoically bear all the force of insults and subterfuge, because his desire to return to Croatia and live and work there was stronger than that, Mira remained in exile forever. It was only at the end of Frljić's mandate that Rijeka's HNK opened its doors to her, and in March XNUMX she returned to the Croatian theater in a